The pseudonym Thomas B. Casasin belongs to a largely unknown Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer. His name appeared in a memo researchers for years have discussed that supports that at least one Agency employee considered using Lee Harvey Oswald for the acquisition of foreign intelligence. While this does not definitively connect Oswald to the CIA, it does offer that possibility was quite real. While the mythical secret agent Oswald a few offer is improbable, we do have verifiable evidence dispelling past claims that Oswald would never be considered for official use.i However, there is more to the story of Casasin than just the prior versions of this notable memo.
The latest JFK Records Act release has provided a fully unredacted copy of the Casasin memo and handwritten notes that reveal the true names of both men in the letter. The author of the memo is Agency officer Jacques Richardson aka Thomas B. Casasin and the recipient is listed as CIA employee James M. Flint aka Walter Haltigan.ii Richardson is the only yet verifiable official employee with recorded operational interest in Lee Harvey Oswald who clearly expressed his desire in an official document. Who were these men and how did Oswald come to be a possible intelligence source?
Jacques Richardson worked for the Agency "...in Japan from 1955 to June 1960." The CIA transferred Richardson later that year and reassigned him to the CIA's Soviet Russia Division to serve "...as Chief of the Soviet Base of the North Asia Command." His unit was one of four and its base targeted the Soviet Union specifically as opposed to other Communist regimes in the area. Richardson worked in Section 6 "...in support of the Soviet Russia Division of the CIA; he characterized that work as classical espionage work against the USSR. He said it involved penetration for the purpose of espionage, and included cartography, demography, sociology, and experts in the fields of science and political science." Richardson subsequently had discussions with the Chief and Deputy Chief of the Section 6 Research group about interviewing Oswald via "...KUJUMP (Operations Division or Domestic Contacts Division) or other suitable channels."
Richardson defined the "suitable channels" were "...the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the FBI. He said he believed he had received maybe one State Department dispatch on the returning American. Richardson supported the CIA found Oswald appeared "odd" based on his ability to live in the Soviet Union and quickly marry a Soviet citizen. He "...believed some type of controlled intelligence station should approach Oswald; they would be able to contact and talk to him in a perfunctory manner for debriefing purposes." This clearly dispels prior official claims of no interest existing to use Oswald for intelligence purposes if only to debrief him. Richardson further states, "...during the period 1945-60 no more than 10 American defectors came to their attention from the State Department and the military." He reveals the CIA Legal Travelers Program, a program that "...involved using persons to give information about the Soviet Union who had a 'very legitimate' presence in the Soviet Union, such as scientists, etc." Officials would then debrief these "...people and defectors would write the information and pass it on."iii The CIA had an interest in Minsk, the area Oswald lived in, due to "special design plants in Minsk of interest to the CIA...The targeted plant dealt with aviation, nuclear energy, bacteriological warfare, etc...Additionally, anyone in the area of those plants was of interest to the agency."
Richardson identifies Alexander Sokaloff of the Soviet Russia Division as leading the Legal Travelers Program. He states the program began prior to 1960 with the lessening of tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union. The program "...operated in such a way that the agency contact was in touch with the traveler well before the proposed trip and would be informed as to which areas would be visited, what he would be doing in the country, etc." "The agency contact would then be able to give the traveler the agency's 'requirements' for information while he was abroad." Richardson was opposed to the program because of the investment of resources and involved risks and not directly involved. He stated the "Harvey Story" reference in the memo was possibly a cryptonym or code but he doubts he would have listed a true name and informs officials he was never prior contacted by anyone, including the Warren Commission.iv
Yet Richardson did not initially remember exactly when these conversations occurred. He originally states the prior referenced memo regarding Oswald was created in 1960. While Richardson originally placed the discussion in the summer of 1960 "...it is apparent that if the discussion ensued during or after Oswald's return to the United States, SR/6 discussion would have been during the summer of 1962. Casasin (Richardson) during an HSCA interview confirmed summer 1962 as the correct reference period.v vi Officials referencing the memo incorrectly state the date it was created was in 1964 but the actual date in the original document is November 25, 1963. Having resolved the outstanding issues of the document's origin, we can now examine later interviews of Richardson and others.
House Select Committee on Assassinations Staff Member Surrell Brady conducted an extensive interview with Richardson during 1978 in Paris, France. A summary of Richardson's comments offer that he eventually believed "Oswald was sent out of the Soviet Union by the KGB, so he exercised caution and did not attempt to debrief Oswald..." Richardson asserts "The fact of no follow-up on that lead was not unusual...He (Oswald)...was of only marginal interest to the Agency...it is inconceivable that Oswald would have been any type of operative of the CIA." However, Richardson also gave his opinion that the nature of KGB operations made it conceivable Oswald could have been a "...lay-low Soviet operative."vii It seems while many officials have ever contended a conspiracy did not occur, some officials merely opposed the type of feasible conspiracy. If a public claim ignores all of the contending evidence and possible connections to United States intelligence and wholly blames Communist groups, officials are suddenly more open-minded. Despite Richardson's unsubstantiated opinions regarding Oswald's possible allegiance, not just the KGB utilized such agents.
Various intelligence groups and employees have and continue to utilize peripheral witting and unwitting assets. The vast majority would use any means necessary to avoid blowback from such arrangements. Additionally Richardson "...said he does not recall any discussion concerning the possible use of American defectors to penetrate the Soviets. He said one reason for no interest in such use was probably that the First Chief Directorate of the KGB would suspect any such American from the beginning as being CIA connected." Indeed suspicion would be extremely high for a US defector, but if that defector had attempted suicide to demonstrate their "undying loyalty" to Marxism then married and had a child with a Russian citizen, it might sway prior Soviet official skepticism. At least in Oswald's case this sort behavior appears to have successfully provided him the desired outcome of extending his time in the Soviet Union.
Richardson further objected to using Oswald for a long-term penetration of the Soviets and stated this means of intelligence gathering was not "the American Way". Yet other evidence verifies the CIA used and cultivated multiple Soviet double agents to penetrate KGB intelligence circles, and this would contend Richardson's characterization.viii The CIA spent hundreds of millions of dollars to prevent the spread of Communism abroad and to fight the Russian and Cuban Intelligence structure. Yet Cuba's DGI (Cuban Intelligence) was minor in comparison to the influence of the KGB. The great Cuban threat was not just revolutionary Communism but the enduring fear of pervasive Soviet institutional Communism. The CIA would likely use any method, including using long-term and slowly placed intelligence assets to combat the advancement of Soviet influences.
The Select Committee desired for Richardson to provide whatever evidence he possessed regarding Oswald and his possible connections to the CIA. He states originally creating the memo for "...a Senior Officer in the Soviet Office in the Paris Station at the time of the assassination." This officer used the pseudonym (false name) Robert G Lamprell, and this officer directed the memo to the Chiefs of both Agency's Soviet Russia and Western Hemisphere Divisions. Richardson also directed a copy of the memo to another senior officer, the aforementioned James M. Flint using the pseudonym Walter Haltigan. Flint served as the "...Chief of the Soviet Section of the Paris Station which corroborated (Richardson's) recollection."ix Flint told officials that Richardson worked out of his home and not the American Embassy where he was stationed, and Flint did not receive the Casasin memo because he was in the hospital. Flint similar to Richardson believed that if the Agency used Oswald, he would have been aware. Yet no evidence but speculations and the endorsements of just two officers supports that claim. No one likely had knowledge of all related operations in a group that prided itself on concealing and compartmentalizing information.
The former Chief of Soviet Russia Division in 1963 David Murphy was questioned regarding the Casasin memo and Murphy offered that he was on a CIA "tour of duty" in England. Despite the memos transmission to his office Murphy claims he did not hear of Oswald until "...following the assassination on November 22, 1963." The question is did Murphy ignore or miss the prior memo or did someone in the chain prevent him from learning of the memo's contents? In either instance, the CIA had multiple chances to learn of Oswald prior to the assassination of President Kennedy. Officials contacted a former senior CIA Officer in Moscow using the pseudonym Robert Lamprell and he informed them Oswald's attempt to renounce his citizenship in 1959 at the American Embassy while stationed at CIA headquarters.x The Select Committee also contacted Paul Hartman a former member of the CIA's Counter Intelligence Staff Research and Analysis Group.Hartman was unable to find any credible evidence that Oswald was connected to the Agency but the Committee only contacted a handful of the Soviet Russia Division's former membership related to the matter.
Could the Agency potentially have used Oswald without his knowledge? An internal document relates the meeting of Agency employees and Select Committee Staff and exposes two interesting cases. The first is an unconnected matter where the Agency used an unwitting man named Calvillo who had performed a service for the Agency without knowledge of having done so. The Agency had provided him employment in order to create a situation for intelligence purposes. Calvillo was a journalist hired to interview refugees and write news articles the Agency desired created and had a minor connection to the JFK case the Select Committee sought to explore. This would illustrate the CIA could and did utilize people for their operations and sometimes those used had no inkling it had occurred.
The more relevant matter relates to the Casasin memo problem the Agency faced. Richardson had worked under non-official cover and this did not provide him diplomatic immunity for the various possible crimes he committed in service to the Agency. His later employment at the time by a United Nations organization would make his public unmasking uncomfortable for the Agency and possibly affect international relations. The more valuable information is while attempting to cast doubt on Oswald and his actions being odd, Richardson had previously been running a traveler "agent" inside the Soviet Union who met a Russian girl and married her. This "agent" was "...successful in getting his Russian wife out of the country, as Oswald was in getting Marina out." While the Agency had "...no problem in arranging an interview with Casasin (Richardson) but the name of the agent we do not wish to reveal..." Thus, despite his protestations Richardson did conduct a very similar operation to the one alleged by Commission detractors regarding Oswald.xi Additionally, Richardson previously noted roughly a dozen similar cases of Russian women marrying foreigners, immigrating with them, and then after the relationship ceased they remained in their adopted nations. Richardson states the CIA was able to connect some of these women to the KGB, thus if the pattern is to be regarded, Marina would be the possible sleeper agent and not her "odd" husband.xii Yet this does not support the official claims of a Communist plot using Oswald and thus is set aside.
Similar actions and circumstances are noteworthy; officials claim that despite the verifiable similarities between the unnamed agent and Lee Harvey Oswald's actions, they are unrelated. Agency personnel claiming there was no interest in Oswald clearly ignore the evidence verifying there was interest for some time. Could another officer or agent have been using Oswald? Despite the misgivings expressed by the Agency's employees, Oswald is present while the very same proposed operations and programs that could have manipulated him were active.
Jacques Richardson desired to approach Oswald for intelligence purposes while prior directing his own unnamed agent. This agent like Oswald improbably married a Russian woman during the Cold War and was able to immigrate with her abroad. Reasonable doubts and questions certainly remain, not least of which is the name of Richardson's agent. While this agent's true name is elusive his cryptonym according to multiple documents is AEOCEAN-3, AEOCEAN is the operational code name for the Legal Travelers Program of which AEOCEAN-3 was a part.xiii Who is the man that was able to prior undertake such improbable actions and fade into history?
i. Central Intelligence Agency file, Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald, November 25, 1963, 104-10067-10212
iii. House Select Committee on Assassination, Segregated CIA Collection, Interview of Thomas B. Casasin, August 17, 1978, p. 5, 180-10143-10227
iv. Ibid p. 6,
v. Ibid, p. 4
vi. House Select Committee on Assassination, Segregated CIA Collection, SR People, Summary of Thomas B. Casasin, August 17, 1978, p. 1, 180-10142-10391
vii. Ibid, p. 3
viii. CIA, Russ Holmes Work File, As HQs Aware Station Double Agents have not had meetings with Sovs since assassination, November 29, 1963, 104-10431-10010
ix. HSCA, Seg CIA Coll, SR People, Summary of TB Casasin, pp. 2, 3
x. Ibid, pp. 4-6
xi. HSCA, Seg. CIA Coll., Meeting with HSCA Staffers, Box 57, p. 5, 104-10126-10394
xii. CIA file, Russ Holmes Work File, Dispatch: Lee Harvey Oswald/Forwarded Memo by Thomas B. Casasin, December 16, 1963, p. 2, 104-10429-10239
xiii. HSCA, Seg. CIA Coll., Cable of HSCA Staffer Brady Interview, Box 11, August 11, 1978, 104-10065-10082
Dallas and the Documents